Toolbox
Contributor
Providers
ToolboxContributorProvidersOthers

Compare StarkWare vs Wanchain Bridges providers

This page compares StarkWare and Wanchain across Bridges provider data, including plan type, API type, chain, pricing, technology, available APIs, limitations, security features, monitoring, regions, and documentation links where available.

Compared providers: StarkWare, Wanchain.

12 providers and 12 plans to compare
12
Offer
Chain
TX Speed SLA
Throughput SLA
Technology
Open Source
Support
Supported Chains
Available APIs
Monitoring & Analytics
Additional Features
Asset Types
Price
Economical Security
Economical Security Note
Audits Performed
Decentralization
SDK
Tags
Minimize Sidebar
StarkWare
mainnet
Native L1↔L2 Token Bridge
Yes
Email, Bridge UI
ethereum, bitcoin, solana
Deposit, Withdrawal
Starknet Messaging, ETH & ERC-20 Support
ETH, ERC-20
Gas Fee
Yes
Starknet Audits
Partially Decentralized
Cairo
Bridge
Wanchain
mainnet
Asset Bridge
Yes
Telegram, Email, Discord
ethereum, bnb chain, polygon, avalanche, astar, sonic, unichain, world chain, wanchain, bitcoin, arbitrum, base, bitrock, blast, cardano, celo, dogecoin, energi, fantom, kava, linea, litecoin, metis, moonbeam, moonriver, noble, okt chain, optimism, odyssey, plyr, polkadot, polygon zkevm, shido, solana, songbird, sui, telos, tron, vechain, vinuchain, x layer, xdc, xrp ledger, edexa, f(x) core, zksync era
Asset Transfer
Bridge Monitoring
Cross-chain asset bridging, WAN token discounts
ERC-20: USDT
10.2%, min. 0.2 USD, has discounts up to 80% based on WAN token holdings
Yes
Regular audits
Decentralized
Node.JS SDK
BridgeDocs
chain.love

chain.love

LinkedInXTelegramGitHub
DocumentationWhitepaper

©2024-2026 CHAIN.LOVE